The Slaves of Sharia
Assimilation is a crime against humanity…There is no moderate or immoderate Islam. Islam is Islam, and that’s it…The mosques are our barracks, the minarets our bayonets, the cupolas our helmets, and the faithful our soldiers.
Tyyip Erdogan, President of Turkey, 2008
Tashfeen Malik and Syed Farook were Islam’s faithful soldiers in San Bernardino, yet out of fear for being called racists, their neighbors remained quiet. According to the lawyers of the terrorists’ family, Farook’s brothers never saw her face due to the full burqa she always wore in public.
A full burqa she always wore in public. Does this sound like assimilation to you?
Sharia is the Islamic system of law, and as the Islamist immigrant population continues to rise within the US, our cities, governments, and campuses are willingly catering to immigrants who refuse to assimilate–shrouding themselves not only in a burqa, but in our US constitution. Yet Sharia and our Constitution cannot “coexist” in a modern, civilized society.
A random survey of 100 representative mosques in the U.S. was conducted to measure the correlation between Sharia adherence and dogma calling for violence against non-believers. Of the 100 mosques surveyed, 51% had texts on site rated as severely advocating violence; 30% had texts rated as moderately advocating violence; and 19% had no violent texts at all. Mosques that presented as Sharia adherent were more likely to feature violence-positive texts on site than were their non-Sharia-adherent counterparts. In 84.5% of the mosques, the imam recommended studying violence-positive texts. The leadership at Sharia-adherent mosques was more likely to recommend that a worshipper study violence-positive texts than leadership at non-Sharia-adherent mosques. 58% of the mosques invited guest imams known to promote violent jihad. The leadership of mosques that featured violence-positive literature was more likely to invite guest imams who were known to promote violent jihad than was the leadership of mosques that did not feature violence-positive literature on mosque premises.
To understand Islam is to understand Sharia, and in a 2007 report, entitled “Radicalization in the West”, the NYPD identified the implementation of Sharia and the establishment of a global Islamic state (Caliphate) as the driving “Jihadi-Salafi ideology” behind jihadists in the U.S and beyond. What is Jihadi-Salafi ideology? According to the report:
Jihadi-Salafi ideology is but one stream of the broader Salafi movement. The general goal of this Sunni revivalist interpretation of Islam is to create a “pure” society that applies a literal reading of the Quran and adheres to the social practices that prevailed at the time of 7th century Arabia.
Implementation of sharia law and replacement of the system of nation states with a worldwide Caliphate are the ultimate political aims. While other Salafi currents encourage non-violent missionary or political activities to achieve these religious/political goals, jihadi-Salafis utilize endorsements of respected scholars of Islam to show that their aims and violent means are religiously justified.
- Contemporary Saudi (Wahhabi) scholars have provided the religious legitimacy for many of the arguments promoted by the jihadists.
- Extreme intolerance and hostility towards unbelievers, including Jews, Christians, Hindus and Shiites, is a core doctrine provided by Wahhabi religious thought. It provides the primary theological foundation for jihadi-Salafi causes and reduces the barriers to violence.
- The Political Dimension. The political aspect of jihadi-Salafi ideology is heavily underpinned by the work of Sayyid Qutb, an Egyptian author, Islamist, and the leading intellectual of the Muslim Brotherhood in the 1950’s and 1960’s. He believed that Islam was under attack from the West and divided the world into the Muslim and the non-Muslim. To Qutb, democracy challenged the sovereignty of God’s divine law and should be resisted. Moreover, he also contended that militant jihad had to be used to attack institutions and societies in order to overthrow non- Islamic governments and to bring about a “pure” Islamic society.
- For many Muslims in the West, especially those of the second and third generation who are seeking to learn about their Muslim heritage, the Salafi interpretation is the version of Islam they are most widely exposed to. It has become more mainstream and is proliferated within diaspora communities. This interpretation of Islam is not the cultural Islam of their parents or their home countries.
When Barack Obama took the international stage in Manila to denounce Republicans who are fearful of women refugees, Isis invited woman to join in military training for Jihad only if they were dressed according to Sharia and separated from men.
Where does Hillary Clinton, the champion of women’s rights, stand on Sharia law? She compares Sharia to Christianity, funds the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt, and dismisses the clash of civilizations by regurgitating the myopic and dangerous foreign policy of Barack Obama, and has, for decades, been advised by Huma Abedin, whose familial ties to the Muslim Brotherhood/radical Islam can be found here. Hillary’s feminist supporter’s are ecstatic about Sharia law and so are her Saudi donors.
San Bernardino proves that Isis male and female soldiers, and Isis sympathizers, walk amongst us and lead us, and if the FBI and DHS doesn’t have Minneapolis on their terrorist watch list, now may be a good time to start:
If Islamaphobia applies to those who call out misogyny of 7th century savages, then by all means, Loretta Lynch, I am guilty. Arrest me, George Pataki and anyone else who dares to speak the truth, draw Muhammed, or live a free life–unlike the slaves of Sharia, shrouded in misogyny.